A Review of “The Sympathizer,” a Pulitzer Prize winner by Viet Thanh Nguyen

Views & Reviews: essays and book reviews

Viet Thanh Nguyen’s The Sympathizer is nothing short of a literary triumph. Winner of the 2016 Pulitzer Prize for Fiction, this novel is a gripping, darkly satirical, and deeply philosophical exploration of war, ideology, identity, and the immigrant experience. It is rare to encounter a debut novel that so seamlessly blends historical depth, political critique, psychological insight, and linguistic mastery, but Nguyen accomplishes all this with an astonishing level of sophistication.

Set against the backdrop of the Vietnam War and its aftermath, The Sympathizer is narrated by an unnamed protagonist who is a Communist double agent embedded in the South Vietnamese military. His story unfolds as a confession written to his captors, a brilliant narrative device that allows Nguyen to layer irony, ambiguity, and self-recrimination into the text. The novel follows the protagonist from the chaotic fall of Saigon in 1975 to his exile in the United States, where he continues to work undercover for the Communist Party while wrestling with the moral and existential dilemmas of divided loyalty.

A Unique Perspective on the Vietnam War

What sets The Sympathizer apart from the vast body of Vietnam War literature is its perspective. Most English-language accounts of the war have been dominated by American viewpoints—whether that of soldiers, policymakers, or disillusioned anti-war activists. In contrast, Nguyen’s novel provides a voice to the Vietnamese experience, an aspect of history that has often been marginalized. However, rather than presenting a simplistic nationalist narrative, the novel complicates traditional dichotomies of good and evil, right and wrong.

The protagonist is a man of two minds, and this duality defines both his personal struggle and the novel’s thematic structure. As the child of a French father and a Vietnamese mother, he is of mixed race, who belongs everywhere and nowhere. His role as a Communist mole working within the South Vietnamese military further deepens this duality he simultaneously believes in the Communist revolution and yet is appalled by its cruelty; he serves his South Vietnamese general while secretly undermining him. This split identity is not just a personal burden but a metaphor for the fractured state of Vietnam itself, torn apart by war, colonialism, and ideological battles.

A Masterful Prose Style

Nguyen’s prose is dazzling, witty, sharp, and infused with a biting irony that recalls the best of Graham Greene and Joseph Heller. From the very first sentence, the novel grips the reader with its bold voice:

“I am a spy, a sleeper, a spook, a man of two faces. Perhaps not surprisingly, I am also a man of two minds.”

This opening sets the tone for a narrative that is both intellectually rigorous and darkly comedic. The novel brims with aphoristic insights, sardonic observations, and scathing critiques of American culture, Cold War politics, and Hollywood’s depiction of Vietnam. Nguyen skillfully dismantles a myth of whether the American belief in its own benevolence or the Communist faith in absolute ideological purity are stronger.

One of the novel’s most memorable sections involves the protagonist’s work as a consultant on a Hollywood war film, an obvious stand-in for Apocalypse Now. Here, Nguyen delivers a blistering satire of how America distorts history to fit its own narratives. The Vietnamese characters in the film are relegated to nameless, voiceless extras, mere props in an American war story. This scathing critique of cinematic colonialism not only serves as one of the book’s most humorous episodes but also as one of its most devastatingly truthful.

Complex Characters and Moral Ambiguity

Nguyen’s characters are richly drawn, defying easy categorization. The protagonist is deeply flawed, capable of acts of kindness and cruelty, self-aware yet deluded, idealistic yet pragmatic. He is not a traditional hero, nor is he a clear-cut villain. His moral struggles, his desire to belong, and his ultimate disillusionment make him one of the most compelling narrators in contemporary fiction.

The supporting cast is equally vivid. The General, a proud and defeated South Vietnamese officer, embodies the tragic dignity of the losing side. Bon, the protagonist’s best friend, is a fiercely loyal anti-Communist who despises everything the narrator secretly stands for, creating a tragic tension in their friendship. Man, the protagonist’s Communist handler, represents the cold ideological purity that the narrator both admires and fears. These characters, along with a host of others, including corrupt politicians, ruthless revolutionaries, and American bureaucrats, paint a complex and often damning portrait of war and its aftermath.

A Story of Exile and Belonging

At its core, The Sympathizer is also a novel about exile. The protagonist, along with his fellow South Vietnamese refugees, arrives in America not as victors but as the defeated. Their struggle to assimilate, to rebuild their lives while clinging to the past, is portrayed with both empathy and critique. Nguyen does not romanticize the immigrant experience; instead, he exposes the loneliness, the racism, and the painful nostalgia that define exile.

Yet, the novel refuses to offer simplistic resolutions. The protagonist’s journey is not one of redemption or closure but of continued struggle. Even when he returns to Vietnam, his hopes of finding ideological clarity are shattered. He realizes that the Communist victors are no more virtuous than their enemies; brutality, paranoia, and oppression exist on both sides. In the end, the narrator’s greatest realization is that he belongs nowhere, not in America, not in Vietnam, not even within his own ideology.

A Political and Philosophical Tour de Force

Nguyen’s novel is not just a historical narrative; it is a deeply philosophical meditation on power, ideology, and identity. It forces readers to confront uncomfortable questions: What does it mean to be loyal? Can revolutionaries avoid becoming oppressors? Is there such a thing as a just war? These questions are not answered definitively, but they linger long after the last page is turned.

The novel also serves as a critique of American imperialism and hypocrisy. The protagonist, despite being a Communist, is deeply familiar with American culture, and he deconstructs it with razor-sharp wit. He sees through the contradictions of American exceptionalism, exposing the ways in which the United States, while claiming to spread democracy, often enforces its will through violence and coercion.

At the same time, The Sympathizer does not let Communism off the hook. The protagonist’s ultimate disillusionment with the Party reveals the perils of dogmatism, the dangers of an ideology that sacrifices individuals for the supposed greater good. In this way, the novel is not a partisan work but a deeply human one, showing the tragic consequences of ideological extremes.

Conclusion: A Modern Classic

Few novels achieve the level of literary excellence, historical insight, and emotional depth that The Sympathizer does. It is a novel that entertains, enlightens, and challenges its readers, demanding that they rethink familiar narratives about war, identity, and morality. Viet Thanh Nguyen has written not just a great Vietnam War novel, but a great novel, one that will be read, studied, and debated for years to come.

With its masterful prose, unforgettable characters, and searing political critique, The Sympathizer stands as one of the most important works of 21st-century literature. It is a novel that deserves all its accolades and more a modern classic that resonates far beyond its historical setting, speaking to the universal human struggle for identity, truth, and belonging.